Global Humanitarian Overview 2024

As local as possible: progress in making localization in humanitarian action a reality

The participation of local and national actors in humanitarian coordination structures

Engaging local and national actors (L/NAs) is critical to the success of humanitarian action. L/NAs are often the first responders and at the heart of humanitarian response. They provide an invaluable understanding of local challenges and potential solutions, and they can mobilize local networks and offer greater access to affected populations. They contribute to both empower local communities as rights holders and to a more effective, efficient and sustainable humanitarian response with enhanced connections and accountability to the community which is being served. The participation and leadership of L/NAs in humanitarian response mechanisms, reflecting affected people in all their diversities, is key to ensuring a response is adapted to the local context.

Progress was tracked through the annual mapping of IASC coordination structures covering 30 locations during 2022, with over 2,360 coordination structures mapped at national and subnational levels. There has been an increasing level of participation across many humanitarian coordination structures, but more remains to be done in terms of facilitating L/NAs’ leadership of these structures.

Percentage of clusters, sectors, areas of responsibility with local/national actors in leadership roles globally

Percentage of total members who are local/national actors globally

L/NAs participated in the full range of humanitarian coordination mechanisms at both the national and the operational levels. They served as members of Humanitarian Country Teams (HCTs), co-chaired Clusters, participated in Strategic Advisory Groups, thematic working groups and contributed to advancing operational response on inter-cluster coordination groups (ICCGs). LNA’s were present in 83 per cent of HCTs in 2022. They also increased their share of seats on HCTs, accounting for 10 per cent of all HCT membership (up from 9 per cent the previous year). In 2022, the number of L/NAs among members of HCTs increased in Burkina Faso, Lebanon, Mali, Myanmar, the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), Somalia and Syria-Gaziantep.

L/NAs participated in 56 per cent of Inter-Cluster Coordination Groups (ICCGs) – a notable increase from 33 per cent in 2021. Globally, L/NAs constituted 5 per cent of total ICCG membership in 2022 (up from 3 per cent in 2021). Across national-level clusters, sectors and areas of responsibility (AoRs), L/NAs’ membership increased slightly to approximately 51 per cent of the total numbers of cluster/sector/AoR members globally – an 3 per cent increase compared to 2021. LNAs were present on 95 per cent of Strategic Advisory Groups (SAG), making up over 35 per cent of SAG membership.

Normative developments in 2023

Humanitarian donors and members of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) recognize the vital role played by local and national actors in humanitarian response. In October 2022, the IASC endorsed Guidance on the provision of overheads to local and national partners, to overcome challenges in the provision of funding to cover overheads i.e. expenditures outside of normal programming, which are necessary for organizations to deliver on their mandate and ensure their sustainability. In March 2023, the Grand Bargain caucus on funding for localization – a unique agreement between some of the largest donors and humanitarian organizations – put forward key recommendations relating to the funding of L/NAs. Signatories agreed (i) on how to measure funding going to L/NAs; (ii) to report all funding to L/NAs through publicly available platforms (notably, the Financial Tracking Service) and; (iii) to develop individual roadmaps for when and how they will meet target of channeling 25 per cent of total humanitarian funding to L/NAs.

A collective monitoring and accountability framework was also published by the Grand Bargain caucus in May 2023, which will enhance the ability to compare data on funding and identify the channels and amounts of funding reaching L/NAs from all donors. In a positive development, donors such as the EU and USAID have recently developed donor localization strategies and internal guidance.

Empowering local actors through pooled funds

The Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) and the Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPFs) continue to ensure that life-saving assistance reaches the most affected by humanitarian crises. These funds provide coherent and timely responses, support to in-field coordination and they reinforce the leadership of Humanitarian Coordinators (HCs). By mid-October 2023, the Funds had allocated a total of US$1.5 billion to assist people most in need.

Localization, in line with humanitarian response and coordination systems, remains a key priority for the Pooled Funds, emphasizing support for frontline responders and women-led organizations. The CBPF Global Guidelines, revised in 2022 and re-launched in 2023, reaffirm the importance of advancing localization as a main aim of the CBPFs. The Guidelines ensure a coherent and harmonized approach to the governance and operations of the CBPFs, they outline provisions on the quantity and quality of funding to be disbursed to L/NAs as well as for the engagement of local entities in governance and supporting the capacity development and visibility of L/NAs who are recipients of the funds.

Over the past two years, CBPFs have significantly increased support for local and national partners. By October 2023, 43 per cent of all funding from the CBPFs had been channeled to local and national partners, a continued increase from previous years, and surpassing the 25 per cent global benchmark set at the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit.

Although CERF can only directly fund UN agencies/organizations, the Fund plays an important role in enabling localization. CERF allocation strategies are jointly developed by UN agencies and NGOs, and CERF funding is implemented through partnerships between UN agencies/organizations and NGOs. During the 2022 and 2023 allocations of the CERF Underfunded Emergencies (UFE) window, the Emergency Response Coordinator encouraged UN country teams to strengthen engagement with national and local partners on the design and implementation of CERF funding. Resident Coordinators/Humanitarian Coordinators were also encouraged to set ambitious targets for CERF UFE funding to be sub-granted to national and local organizations. As a result, recent UFE rounds have seen about a quarter of funding being sub-granted to national and local partners instead of the overall average of around 15 per cent.

In 2021, CERF issued an $25 million multi-country, multi-year block grant to UN Women and UNFPA to strengthen GBV prevention, mitigation and response in humanitarian action. The block grant concluded in 2023. The GBV-focused allocation specifically focused on the empowerment of local WLOs/WROs, who were to receive a minimum of 30 per cent of all funds as implementing partners. This target was exceeded in the implementation. The grant was also unique in that it built in a learning envelope to support capacity development of fund recipients. The Pooled Funds continue to actively work on increasing the funding to local WLOs, and to ensure their representation on the Humanitarian Funds’ advisory boards. In 2023, countries with at least one WLO represented in their respective advisory board included Afghanistan, CAR, DRC, Lebanon, Myanmar, OPT, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Ukraine, Venezuela, Yemen.

References

  1. According to IASC guidance, this category includes the following entities where represented: national and local authorities, national NGOs and consortiums, national Red Cross/Crescent Societies, and national private sector.
  2. The mapping covers 29 humanitarian operations, but one has two locations (Syria)
  3. Presence or participation in a coordination mechanism denotes attendance at meetings, partaking in assessments, workshops, etc. Membership denotes being a formal constituent of a group and being involved in decisions about governance, providing directions for assessments and plans, etc.
  4. ICCG membership largely reflects cluster leadership – if in a given country there are no local actors leading clusters, sectors or areas of responsibility (AoRs), then likely there will be no national NGO members within the ICCG unless the ICCG decides to allocate a specific seat to local or national NGOs.
  5. Participatory Action Research was conducted to accompany this process resulting in the Women-led Organizations: Leadership in GBV Coordination Resource Package, Trócaire: 2023.
  6. For more information on their activities, see Active in Development (https://adasom.org) and Women for Change (https://www.wfcsud.org)