Global Humanitarian Overview 2025

Putting people and communities at the centre of humanitarian action: a collective effort, but still too slow

It is widely accepted that an accountable humanitarian system—one that places decision-making power in the hands of people affected by crisis—is central to effective humanitarian action. Yet too often, the way the humanitarian system works—characterized by pre-defined calls for sector-specific project proposals, complex coordination frameworks, language barriers, and a proliferation of single-agency accountability initiatives—undermines its flexibility and limits its ability to collectively engage with and respond to community needs and priorities. Affected communities have voiced frustration over lack of progress, as feedback mechanisms often yield few results.

  • In Venezuela, an inter-agency ‘contact line’ makes it possible for people’s feedback to reach humanitarian decision-makers. The contact line offers five ways for affected people to share their concerns and request support. After a successful pilot in two municipalities, the Humanitarian Coordinator rallied UN representatives to scale the approach nationally with dedicated human and financial resources. The contact line now includes 11 UN agencies, covers all 23 states and the Capital District, and offers 19 referral and assistance routes connected to the humanitarian architecture. Since the contact line began in 2021, usage has continued to grow with over 43,000 people to date—88 per cent of them women—accessing it to ask about humanitarian programmes and available solutions.
  • In Afghanistan, the Community Voices and Accountability Platform has enabled humanitarian partners to adjust responses and reallocate funds based on community feedback. A complementary validation system enables affected people to access and discuss feedback with the humanitarian community, ensuring decision-making is genuinely informed by those impacted by crisis. As a result, the 2025 humanitarian needs and response planning process has been directly shaped by community input, focusing on critical issues such as aid selection criteria, outreach to women and persons with disabilities, and the balance between addressing immediate needs and providing sustainable support. The Afghanistan Humanitarian Country Team has also reinforced its commitment to safe, inclusive and accountable humanitarian action by establishing and monitoring the Afghanistan Accountability Index.
  • In OPT, the Humanitarian Service Directory consolidates key service information, frequently asked questions, verified communication channels and awareness raising materials for humanitarians to package, amplify and share information with affected people. It supports helpline operators manage high volumes of inquiries more quickly and enables more efficient referrals and complaints-handling. The directory has addressed operational challenges such as inconsistent service data, communication gaps, high staff turnover and variations in information across geographical areas. Developed through stakeholder consultations, it has strengthened collective AAP efforts throughout the humanitarian response.

However, the humanitarian system has a long way to go in truly placing people at the centre of its responses. This was highlighted in the Inter-Agency Standing Committee’s (IASC) independent review of humanitarian response to internal displacement , which found that too often the IASC humanitarian system is more focused on internal processes than on meaningfully engaging the people it aims to help. The Emergency Relief Coordinator’s Flagship Initiative was launched in 2023 to redesign humanitarian action from the ground up. One year into its implementation, in the four pilot countries of Colombia, Niger, the Philippines and South Sudan, the initiative is shifting the drivers of humanitarian action, organizing assistance around the priorities of crisis-affected communities rather than those of aid providers.

The past two years have seen some progress incollective Accountability to Affected People (AAP), which addresses these issues by going beyond a single humanitarian entity to align systems and decision-making processes around people’s priorities, perceptions and feedback. In 2023 and 2024, the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) allocated $8.6 million through its window to catalyze collective AAP in 16 humanitarian operations. The funding is meant to ensure affected people and the organizations representing them are not simply consulted but are treated as equal partners and included in project design, implementation and evaluation. The grants also emphasize actively including individuals who are marginalized due to identity, disability, ethnicity and other diversities in humanitarian decision-making. CERF funding is already delivering results:

References

  1. Toll-free phone calls, WhatsApp, SMS, email, and face-to-face interactions.
  2. A collective AAP platform, led by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), that brings community feedback and complaints from various channels to a centralized data system to allow humanitarian and development actors and decision makers to course correct the response-based community guidance.
  3. A similar project used in refugee situations is the UNCHR.Help website, which provides tailored information for refugees, asylum-seekers and stateless people on help and services available to them according to their country of residence.
  4. Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Ethiopia, Haiti, Myanmar, Somalia and Sudan.
  5. Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Haiti, Mali, Myanmar, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Yemen.