| CO2: Improve living condition of IDPs by facilitating safe, equitable and dignified access to cross-sectoral humanitarian services, including CCCM |
| IN1: Number of site population reached by camp management services |
People |
1,414,596
|
| IN2: % of sites improved through care and maintenance interventions, including community-based infrastructure rehabilitated through cash for work initiatives |
Percentage |
80
|
| IN3: # of sites with adequate camp management support and site facilitation |
Percentage |
80
|
| IN4: # Sites with functional referral pathways in place to ensure that people with specific needs receive the assistance and protection required |
Percentage |
80
|
| IN5: % of site population who are satisfied with overall levels of service |
Percentage |
80
|
| IN6: % of site population who consider the complaints response mechanisms accessible, effective, confidential and safe |
Percentage |
100
|
| CO3: Enhance the protective environment, respond to vulnerable population with priority on addressing protection gaps and strengthen the predictability and effectiveness of multi sectorial interventions at site level |
| IN1: # Safety audits conducted in coordination with site level protection actors |
Audits |
210
|
| IN2: % of recommended mitigation actions from safety audit directly integrated into site maintenance and addressed with site maintenance Activities |
Percentage |
100
|
| IN3: # of persons living with disabilities reporting to be satisfied with the opportunities they have to influence site decisions |
People |
210,000
|
| IN4: # of displacement sites where planning is done with the participation of the camp population |
Sites |
70
|
| IN5: # of site maintenance activities with a specific focus on PSNs |
Activities |
70
|
| IN6: % displacement sites where sex and age disaggregated data is regularly collected and shared with partners |
Percentage |
100
|
| CO4: Support vulnerable IDPs to recover from the crisis by strengthening community self-management, build resilience to promote solutions for displaced people in sites |
| IN1: # of community engagement initiatives conducted ie. town hall meetings; elections; information campaigns |
Meetings |
30
|
| IN2: # of sites with established phase-out community participation structures and supported with self-management tools |
Sites |
30
|
| IN3: # of displaced people in sites engaged in community level self-reliance activities |
People |
250,000
|
| IN4: % of female committee members who feel their views are taken into account during decision-making processes |
Percentage |
100
|
| IN5: # of sites phased out and handed over to the community for self-management |
Sites |
30
|
| IN6: % of members of site governance structure participating in site phase-out activities |
Percentage |
100
|