South Sudan

  • Humanitarian Response Plan
  • From: 01/01/2023 to: 31/12/2023
  • Published: 20/12/2022
  • Coordinated by: OCHA

Cluster

CLCSS

Coordination and Common Services

keyboard_arrow_down horizontal_rule
There is no caseload or indicator available
Go to cluster page

Cluster Objectives

CO1

Strengthen coordination including joint and complementary needs analysis to inform response

keyboard_arrow_down horizontal_rule
Contributes to
  • Specific Objectives
    • 3.3
    • 3.4
  • Strategic Objective
    • 3
Indicator Unit Target Measure Progress
Percentage of times NAWG prioritized counties received inter-sectoral response scale-up
Percentage
80%
No data
Number of NAWG joint analysis workshops conducted on the South Sudan context
Joint Analyses
4
No data
Number of humanitarian hubs in targeted areas used by humanitarian actors during response scale-up
Numbers
4
No data
Number of joint, methodologically rigorous inter-sectoral needs assessments conducted
Joints Assessments
1
No data

CO2

Enhanced strategic response planning to facilitate principled and well-coordinated humanitarian action.

keyboard_arrow_down horizontal_rule
Contributes to
  • Specific Objectives
    • 3.2
    • 3.3
  • Strategic Objective
    • 3
Indicator Unit Target Measure Progress
Number of coordinated humanitarian response strategies and Periodic Monitoring Review (PMR) reported.
Numbers
2
No data

CO3

Ensure timely monitoring of new displacement and return movements and related needs.

keyboard_arrow_down horizontal_rule
Contributes to
  • Specific Objective
    • 3.3
  • Strategic Objective
    • 3
Indicator Unit Target Measure Progress
Number of early warning flash reports on population movements and trends to inform prioritization of response
Reports
30
No data

CO4

Enhance programme quality through strengthened Accountability to Affected People.

keyboard_arrow_down horizontal_rule
Contributes to
  • Specific Objectives
    • 3.1
    • 3.3
  • Strategic Objective
    • 3
Indicator Unit Target Measure Progress
Percentage of beneficiaries (disaggregated by age, sex and diversity) who have access to safe, child and gender sensitive complaint, feedback and reporting channels in humanitarian response sites for reporting sensitive issues and concerns in aid delivery and misconduct by aid workers.
Percentage
70%
No data
Percentage of cases received in a Complaints Feedback Mechanism that have been “considered as resolved.”
Percentage
70%
No data
Percentage of beneficiaries (disaggregated by age, sex and ability) who report they have access to complaints and feedback mechanisms.
Percentage
75%
No data
Download