People whose homes were damaged by a Russian Armed Forces strike in the village of Bilenke, Donetska Oblast, receive emergency recovery kits from the NGO Angels of Salvation Foundation in collaboration with UNHCR. Angels of Salvation/Oleksii Gutnyk
2.2 Response Boundary-setting, Prioritization and Risk-informed Action
Boundaries of the humanitarian response
The Humanitarian Country Team (HCT)1 applied a strict prioritization for the 2025 response to assist 6 million of the 12.7 million internally displaced people and non-displaced war-affected people, including returnees. These are people experiencing extreme and catastrophic needs (severity phase 4 and 5)2 and are concentrated in the front-line areas. This includes people in need in areas occupied by the Russian Federation. In addition, to prevent a deepening of vulnerability, people in areas with pockets of crisis needs (intersectoral severity level 3)3, mainly in the west and central parts of Ukraine, are prioritized for response in 2025. The response will remain flexible and adaptive, ensuring operational readiness and allowing for adjustments as needs evolve and the context shifts.
As the war in Ukraine enters its fourth year since the full escalation in February 2022, some needs have become protracted, requiring a longer-term approach to address them, linked to existing national mechanisms for sustainability. Therefore, a clear distinction has been made between activities responding to life-saving emergency needs under Strategic Objective 1 and activities under Strategic Objective 2 aimed at enabling access to prioritized essential services delivered through government systems where possible. For the 2025 response, activities that respond to protracted needs arising from structural issues, such as poverty and the broader socioeconomic impact of the war, have been identified and excluded from the HRNP with the aim of sharing them with recovery and development actors.
Prioritization within the response
Response prioritization has been guided by a rigorous intersectoral severity analysis, supported by the Multi- sector Needs Assessments (MSNA) data and other cluster-specific and thematic assessments, and the 2024 HNRP midyear response and gap analysis.
Risk-informed planning
Preparedness for emergency response
Building on lessons learned in 2024, the HNRP incorporates preparedness and emergency response readiness for future shocks, emphasizing rapid response capacity and greater flexibility to scale up for emergencies. Clusters have identified activities linked to shocks to rapidly shift the response to new emergencies and emerging needs. For people displaced or evacuated from front lines to collective sites in the west and centre of Ukraine, a two-phased multisectoral response package has been agreed. The first phase consists of a standard rapid response package to cover immediate needs, and the second phase entails tailored response to cover needs until people have been integrated into the government’s social protection schemes.
Coordination procedures are in place to respond to needs arising from shelling incidents – within the first 60 hours of the incident – through inter-cluster oblast-specific preparedness plans that will be activated in response to new displacement resulting from spikes in hostilities. Activities will include prepositioning emergency supplies/ pipelines, ensuring readiness of facilities and collective sites to respond to emergencies, mapping resources, capacity for mobile services and referral pathways, dissemination of information on risks and services, and capacity-building of front-line workers, communities and locals. Situation monitoring on the front lines will inform the activation of emergency response to shocks, providing flexibility in the implementation to scale up activities as needed.
Humanitarian-development collaboration
The Humanitarian Country Team recognizes the urgency of strengthening engagement and collaboration across humanitarian, recovery and development efforts in Ukraine. The 2025 HNRP has identified activities that are linked to longer-term or protracted needs that have evolved or are no longer related to the direct implications of the war so that they can be addressed in a sustainable way and build resilience of people. This also includes needs resulting from structural issues such as poverty or the broader socio-economic challenges of the war. The HCT will actively promote more inclusive engagement with Government and development actors to include a wide range of stakeholders, including national and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), civil society, and the private sector in these efforts.
A key framework in this effort is the Ukraine UN Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework (UNSDCF) to be launched early next year for the 2025-2029 period. The UNSDCF focuses on supporting the Government on strategic recovery and Ukraine’s sustainable development priorities across four pillars: (1) increased investment in human capital; (2) inclusive economic growth and decent work; (3) responding to major climate and environmental challenges; and (4) supporting inclusive and cohesive society with active civic space and more accountable institutions. The Cooperation Framework strongly focuses on ensuring no one is left behind during recovery, including focused efforts to address the unique needs of displaced populations and foster durable solutions such as reintegration and socioeconomic inclusion. In light of reduced humanitarian funding and Ukraine’s protracted crisis, enhanced coordination and complementarity among humanitarian, recovery and development actors are critical, coupled with robust partnerships with local authorities to streamline efforts and maximize impact. While humanitarian assistance must continue at sufficient scale to support the most vulnerable, recovery efforts must be pursued and scaled up simultaneously to offer medium-term and more sustainable solutions for the most affected communities and populations. These require steady financial resources over the medium and long term, as Ukraine would require years of strong international support and investment to counter the consequences of the Russian Federation′s invasion. The Government of Ukraine has relaunched sector working groups with development actors to support development and recovery programming and prioritization, as well as better alignment with humanitarian efforts. Humanitarian actors will proactively seek to engage in these sector working groups to enhance synergies and complementarity.
Establishing robust linkages with national mechanisms is essential, with a particular focus on integrating humanitarian response with adaptive social protection systems to ensure continuity of assistance and prevent vulnerable people from relapsing into crisis. Despite the ongoing war and economic instability, Ukraine’s social protection system, a crucial tool in addressing poverty, continues to provide vital support through social assistance programmes like the Guaranteed Minimum Income, Housing and Utilities Subsidy, and cash assistance for internally displaced people among others. Fiscal constraints, access challenges, bureaucratic barriers and inefficiencies hinder its effectiveness, but the Ukrainian Government, with the help of international donors, has remained committed to sustaining and improving its social protection framework. As of 2024, the system is undergoing reforms, with support from development donors, aimed at improving coverage, efficiency and responsiveness to the crisis. In 2025, the humanitarian response to protracted needs will need to further evolve to better link and integrate with these systems where feasible, to support durable solutions. This will include improving access to information, referral mechanisms and access for vulnerable people. Streamlining registration processes, enhancing systems interoperability and strengthening referral mechanisms are critical to ensure people can easily transition between humanitarian aid and government social protection programmes, including health and education support. The aim is to progressively transition activities and people reliant on emergency humanitarian aid to long-term social protection programmes when conditions around adequacy and suitability allow. Humanitarian organizations will focus on the most vulnerable people directly affected by the shock of war in areas where the national system faces limitations in reaching scalability. This approach will reduce duplication, improve coordination and ensure more inclusive and sustainable support for all affected people.
Needs outside the HNRP
Some of the activities addressing needs beyond the scope of humanitarian response have been excluded from the 2025 HNRP, to be shared with recovery and development actors. These include awareness-raising activities, training and capacity-building for government counterparts, complete house reconstruction, provision of major household appliances, sustainable energy solutions at household level, distribution and coordination of generators, modular housing initiatives, support to tariff regulations, and the construction of new water and heating infrastructure in non-war-affected areas, or large-scale water and sanitation projects. In addition, the provision of electronic devices for students and teachers, major repairs to multi-storey buildings and the Government’s Prykhystok ‘host-family support’ programme for internally displaced people are no longer included as activities in the 2025 HNRP.
In some cases, some activities – such as legal assistance and protection case management – will not be discontinued but tightened up, focusing on the most vulnerable people affected by war-related shocks who lack safe and effective access to existing government or other services.
References
Humanitarian Country Team (HCT), composed of UN agencies, and international and national NGOs, with Red Cross organizations and donors as observers, provides strategic guidance for implementing the Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan (HNRP).
Severity level 4 refers to areas with high strain on basic services and/or extreme inability to meet basic sectoral needs; severity level 5 depicts a collapse of basic services and/or total inability to meet basic sectoral needs.
Areas with moderate strain on basic services and moderate inability to meet basic sectoral needs.