-
People in need1.8 million
-
People targeted1.8 million
-
Requirements ($)$1.06 billion
-
Coverage59.6%
-
Unmet ($)$0
-
Partners61
Strategic Objectives
1
Strengthen the protection of Rohingya refugee women, men, girls and boys. In close cooperation with the Government of Bangladesh and a¬ected populations, protect individuals and communities, and contribute to an enabling environment for the rights and well-being of Rohingya refugees, placing communities at the centre of the response.
2
Deliver quality, life-saving assistance to populations in need. Maintain, improve and rationalise services and assistance to ensure equal access and improved quality of life for a¬ected populations in need of humanitarian assistance. In close cooperation with the Government of Bangladesh and a¬ected populations, enhance preparedness and contingency plans for disaster responses at the Upazila level.
3
Foster the well-being of communities in Ukhiya and Teknaf Upazilas. In close cooperation with the Government of Bangladesh and a¬ected populations, and in the spirit of supporting the development of communities in Ukhiya and Teknaf, facilitate equitable access to quality services for communities; promote peaceful co-existence; strengthen public service infrastructure and delivery through system and capacity strengthening; support sustainable livelihoods; and rehabilitate the environment and eco-system. In close collaboration with the Government of Bangladesh and affected populations, and in the spirit of supporting the development of communities in Ukhiya and Teknaf, promote equitable access to quality services for communities; promote peaceful co-existence; strengthen public service infrastructure and delivery through system and capacity strengthening; support sustainable livelihoods; and rehabilitate the environment and eco-system.
4
Work towards achieving sustainable solutions in Myanmar. Support Rohingya refugees to build the skills and capacities that would help with their sustainable return and reintegration in Myanmar when conditions become conducive, including in improving their access to education and skills development activities; ensure Rohingya refugee women, men, girls and boys have access to safe, transparent, and consultative communication mechanisms regarding solutions and the situation in Myanmar.
Bangladesh: 2020 Joint Response Plan for Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis (January-December)
https://humanitarianaction.info/plan/906
Humanitarian profile by cluster
03-Nov-2023
Humanitarian profile by cluster
| Cluster | People in Need | People Targeted | % Targeted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHILD PROTECTION |
437,826
|
279,376
|
63.8%
|
| COMMUNICATION WITH COMMUNITIES |
1,018,763
|
910,060
|
89.3%
|
| COMMUNICATION WITH COMMUNITIES COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| COORDINATION |
1,284,000
|
1,284,000
|
100%
|
| COORDINATION COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| EDUCATION |
542,416
|
421,771
|
77.8%
|
| EDUCATION COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| FOOD SECURITY |
1,280,000
|
1,280,000
|
100%
|
| FOOD SECURITY COVID-19 |
2,000,000
|
1,500,000
|
75%
|
| GENDER BASED VIOLENCE |
1,086,696
|
558,617
|
51.4%
|
| HEALTH |
1,257,295
|
1,257,295
|
100%
|
| HEALTH COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| LOGISTICS |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| LOGISTICS COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| NUTRITION |
478,203
|
395,050
|
82.6%
|
| Protection |
1,086,696
|
934,935
|
86.0%
|
| SHELTER/NON-FOOD ITEMS |
868,610
|
862,000
|
99.2%
|
| SHELTER/NON-FOOD ITEMS COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| SITE MANAGEMENT and SITE DEVELOPMENT |
840,000
|
840,000
|
100.0%
|
| SITE MANAGEMENT and SITE DEVELOPMENT COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
| WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE |
1,284,000
|
1,124,587
|
87.6%
|
| WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE COVID-19 |
Pending
|
Pending
|
0%
|
Bangladesh: 2020 Joint Response Plan for Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis (January-December)
https://humanitarianaction.info/plan/906
Cluster overview and funding status (excluding COVID)
03-Nov-2023
Cluster overview and funding status (excluding COVID)
| Cluster | Requirements ($) | Current funding ($) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHILD PROTECTION |
$24 million
|
$8.6 million
|
36.0%
|
| COMMUNICATION WITH COMMUNITIES |
$10 million
|
$1.5 million
|
15.2%
|
| COORDINATION |
$3.6 million
|
$277 thousand
|
7.7%
|
| EDUCATION |
$69 million
|
$11.7 million
|
17.0%
|
| EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS |
$2.5 million
|
$2.9 million
|
116%
|
| FOOD SECURITY |
$254.6 million
|
$192.9 million
|
75.8%
|
| GENDER BASED VIOLENCE |
$24 million
|
$4.3 million
|
17.9%
|
| HEALTH |
$85.6 million
|
$30.4 million
|
35.5%
|
| LOGISTICS |
$1.4 million
|
$1 million
|
71.4%
|
| NUTRITION |
$39.9 million
|
$3.7 million
|
9.1%
|
| Protection |
$40 million
|
$20.4 million
|
51.0%
|
| SHELTER/NON-FOOD ITEMS |
$111.2 million
|
$23.6 million
|
21.2%
|
| SITE MANAGEMENT and SITE DEVELOPMENT |
$95.3 million
|
$13.4 million
|
14.1%
|
| WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE |
$115.5 million
|
$11.1 million
|
9.6%
|
| Funding to sector not reported | N/A |
$218.8 million
|
N/A |
| Funding to multiple sector (shared) | N/A |
$56.3 million
|
N/A |
Bangladesh: 2020 Joint Response Plan for Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis (January-December)
https://humanitarianaction.info/plan/906
Cluster overview and funding status (COVID)
03-Nov-2023
Cluster overview and funding status (COVID)
| Cluster | Requirements ($) | Current funding ($) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNICATION WITH COMMUNITIES COVID-19 |
$5.2 million
|
$169 thousand
|
3.3%
|
| COORDINATION COVID-19 |
$12.1 million
|
$0.5 million
|
4.5%
|
| EDUCATION COVID-19 |
$1.3 million
|
$0
|
0%
|
| EMERGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COVID-19 |
$230 thousand
|
$1.2 million
|
535%
|
| FOOD SECURITY COVID-19 |
$49.7 million
|
$5.9 million
|
11.9%
|
| HEALTH COVID-19 |
$86.5 million
|
$18.8 million
|
21.8%
|
| LOGISTICS COVID-19 |
$1.2 million
|
$1.1 million
|
91.1%
|
| SHELTER/NON-FOOD ITEMS COVID-19 |
$1.6 million
|
$220 thousand
|
13.7%
|
| SITE MANAGEMENT and SITE DEVELOPMENT COVID-19 |
$0.5 million
|
$0
|
0%
|
| WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE COVID-19 |
$23.2 million
|
$1.6 million
|
7.0%
|
| Funding to sector not reported | N/A |
$218.8 million
|
N/A |
| Funding to multiple sector (shared) | N/A |
$56.3 million
|
N/A |
Bangladesh: 2020 Joint Response Plan for Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis (January-December)
https://humanitarianaction.info/plan/906
Indicator overview
03-Nov-2023
Indicator overview
| Indicator |
|---|
| CO1: Continue to support the Government of Bangladesh Camp in Charge Officials in managing the camps and strengthen their capacity while ensuring equitable and safe of access of refugees, including women and girls to standardized and monitored assistance and protection, against agreed standards, coordinating multi-hazard emergency preparedness. |
| IN1: Percentage of refugees living in camps where community led initiatives are set up |
| IN2: Percentage of refugees living in camps where a service monitoring system is operationalized |
| IN3: Percentage of refugees living in camps with a multi-hazard plan has been updated and tested |
| CO1: To reduce excess mortality and morbidity among boys and girls under 5 years old, pregnant and lactating women and other vulnerable groups through provision of life-saving interventions to treat Severe and Moderate Acute Malnutrition. |
| IN1: Number of Boys and Girls aged 6 - 59 months with SAM newly admitted for treatment |
| IN2: Number of Boys and Girls aged 6 - 59 with MAM Months newly admitted for treatment |
| IN3: Proportion of discharged SAM & MAM cases who recovered ≥ 75% |
| IN4: NS EPRP updated and all NS partners instructed in detail about the contents before May 2020 |
| IN5: HC: Number of Boys and Girls aged 6 - 59 months in HCs with SAM newly admitted for treatment |
| CO1: To ensure regular, sufficient, equitable and dignified access for all refugees living in camps and affected Host Communities to sufficient and safe water for drinking and domestic needs. |
| IN1: Number of targeted people disaggregated by sex, age and disability benefitting from at least 20 l/p/d of safe water for drinking and other domestic purposes |
| IN2: Percentage of water quality tests meeting minimum water quality standards |
| IN4: Number of targeted people disaggregated by sex in host communities who are benefiting from water and sanitation services. |
| CO1: Access: Expand and strengthen immediate access to equitable learning opportunities, in a safe and protective environment, for crisis-affected refugee and host community girls and boys aged 3-24 years old |
| IN1: Number of refugee girls and boys aged 3-24 years old having access to equitable learning opportunities, including life skills and resilience programs, in a safe, inclusive and protective environment |
| IN2: Number of crisis-affected host community girls and boys aged 3-24 years old provided support to equitable learning opportunities, including life skills and resilience programs, in a safe, inclusive and protective environment |
| IN3: Number of safe and equipped learning facilities, including learning centres, community-based and cross-sectoral structures, with sex segregated accessible WASH facilities in refugee camps |
| IN4: Number of government and non-formal schools in the host community benefitting from rehabilitation including accessibility works |
| CO1: 1. Reinforce coordination, advocacy and technical support across different sectors and stakeholders for mainstreaming CwC and AAP principles enabling affected peoples to have access to life-saving information and knowledge on rights and services. |
| IN1: # of agencies, sectors and platforms used services and tools produced by CwC Working Group members. |
| IN2: # of humanitarian staff/volunteer trained/oriented on CwC and humanitarian principles |
| IN3: # of humanitarian organizations regularly participating in coordination meetings |
| CO1: Support response leadership and coordination to ensure an effective response, with protection and solutions the as the foundation. |
| IN1: Number of people in need disaggregated by sex and age, and by refugee and host, receiving multi-sector assistance |
| IN2: Number of SEG, Inter-Sector Coordination and district HoSO meetings held and minutes shared |
| IN3: Number of partners using the coordination hub |
| IN4: Number of PSEA discussions facilitated at Sector level |
| CO1: Incentivize logistics coordination and facilitate the rollout of collaborative operational efforts towards strengthening existing local logistics systems. |
| IN1: Number of logistics staff (national/international) attending training activities |
| IN2: Number of (national/international) organizations actively participating in coordination meetings. (provide names of organisations regularly participating to allow for cross-sector aggregation) |
| IN3: Propotion of Logistics Sector partners’ satisfaction feedback rated as “Satisfied” and “Very Satisfied” in regard to coordination initiatives. |
| IN4: Number of workshops addressing technical logistics gaps |
| CO1: Monitor and advocate for access to territory, prevention of refoulement, respect for refugees’ rights, whilst enhancing continuous registration and documentation for all refugee women, men, girls and boys, in order to contribute to sustainable solutions. |
| IN1: Number of situational protection reports produced by the Protection Working Group (PWG), based on common Protection Monitoring Framework and/or ad hoc assessments (e.g. rapid protection Assessments, Border Monitoring, Settlement Protection Profiles, etc.), with recommendation on programming and advocacy priorities |
| IN2: Number of cases supported with legal aid and related services including victims of trafficking and exploitation disaggregated by age and sex |
| IN3: Percentage of camps and targeted host community locations in which trainings on mediation and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are organized for local authorities and community representatives |
| IN4: Percentage of persons of concern for whom data disaggregated by sex, age, location and specific needs is available and updated |
| CO1: Improve equitable access to and utilization of quality lifesaving and comprehensive primary and secondary health services for all crisis-affected populations with special focus on sexual, reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child and adolescent health; mental health and psychosocial support; and non-communicable diseases. |
| IN1: Under 5 mortality rate |
| IN2: Number of clinical mental health consultations per year |
| IN3: Proportion of deliveries assisted by a skilled birth attendant |
| IN4: Proportion of primary health centers that deliver prioritized health services* * defined as: offer CMR services; can manage 3 major NCD groups (excluding cancer); offer at least 3 modern family planning methods including LARC; have a baby resuscitation kit; and have at least one person trained on MHGAP |
| IN5: Number of consultations/person/year disaggregated by age and gender |
| CO1: Ensure and sustain timely provision of life-saving food assistance for Rohingya refugees |
| IN1: Number of refugees receiving regular food assistance through in-kind or e-voucher disaggregated by gender and sex |
| IN2: Percentage of people accessing at least three items of fresh food [1] through voucher |
| IN3: Percentage of people in need reached with timely food assistance (in case of a disaster) |
| IN4: Percentage of targeted people with acceptable Food Consumption Score (FCS) |
| IN5: Number of meetings held by/with camp FSS focal point persons |
| CO1: Monitor and advocate for access to territory, prevention of refoulement, respect for refugees’ rights, whilst enhancing continuous registration and documentation for all refugee women, men, girls and boys, in order to contribute to sustainable solutions. |
| IN1: Number of situational protection reports produced by the Protection Working Group (PWG), based on common Protection Monitoring Framework and/or ad hoc assessments (e.g. rapid protection Assessments, Border Monitoring, Settlement Protection Profiles, etc.), with recommendation on programming and advocacy priorities |
| IN2: Number of cases supported with legal aid and related services including victims of trafficking and exploitation disaggregated by age and sex |
| IN3: Percentage of camps and targeted host community locations in which trainings on mediation and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are organized for local authorities and community representatives |
| IN4: Percentage of persons of concern for whom data disaggregated by sex, age, location and specific needs is available and updated |
| CO1: Strengthen coordination: To improve coverage and complementarity of shelter interventions by taking steps to enhance coordination with other Sectors and government |
| IN1: Number of camps with effective Focal Points in place (either camp Focal Points or Catchment Focal Points) |
| IN2: Number of cross-cutting Sector including HLP guidance/advocacy documents developed that advance the Sector’s strategic objectives |
| IN3: Number of catchment areas with emergency shelter kits prepositioned |
| IN4: Number of Rohingya households with emergency assistance provided after damage verification |
| CO1: Provide coordination and develop and share operational information to facilitate the entire humanitarian response and avoid duplication of efforts. |
| IN1: Information sharing platform maintained |
| CO2: Promote a community-based approach to the response, support community self-protection mechanisms and facilitate meaningful access to specialized services for persons at heightened protection risk, including girls, boys, women and men of all ages and with diverse needs and vulnerabilities, with the ultimate aim of mitigating exposure to protection risks, strengthen the resilience of affected communities, and place communities at the center of the response in line with AAP principles. |
| IN1: Number of people reached by community-led messaging on key protection risks and related mitigation measures |
| IN2: Number of community-led initiatives supported by humanitarian actors |
| IN3: Percentage of the CBCPMs that demonstrate ability to monitor, respond and mitigate child protection risks in their blocks in the camps and in the host communities |
| IN4: Percentage of camps with established Protection Emergency Response Units whose members are trained and ready to be deployed |
| CO2: Maintain existing ETS services including the provision of security telecommunications services (repeaters) and internet connectivity in common operational areas to facilitate the response and ensure the safety and security of staff. |
| IN1: User satisfaction survey |
| CO2: To reduce the burden of malnutrition among boys, girls, pregnant and lactating women and other vulnerable groups through the strengthening and scale up of malnutrition prevention interventions. |
| IN1: Number of children 6 - 59 months reached with Vitamin A supplementation |
| IN2: Number of Boys and Girls aged 6-59 Months reached with Blanket Supplementary Feeding Programs |
| IN3: Number of new PLWs receiving Maternal Nutrition and IYCF counselling |
| IN4: HC: Individual IYCF counselling for SAM caregiver at Centre level. |
| CO2: To ensure all refugees living in camps and affected Host Communities have adequate, appropriate and acceptable toilets to allow rapid, safe and secure access at all times. |
| IN1: Number of targeted people disaggregated by sex, age and disability in camps who have access to functional and safe latrines. |
| IN2: Percentage of households reporting visible waste in the vicinity of their accommodation |
| IN3: Percentage of targeted people disaggregated by sex, age and disability who are accessing safe, functioning and dignified communal bathing facilities. |
| CO2: Quality - Provide quality inclusive education to refugee and host community girls and boys aged 3-24 years old, aligned with Education Sector standards, and increase teaching-related professional development opportunities |
| IN1: Number of learning facilitators from the host and refugee community trained in advanced/thematic education principles, including Disaster Risk Reduction |
| IN2: Number of refugee girls and boys aged 3-24 years old receiving adequate education materials, supplies and equipment aligned with Education Sector standards |
| IN3: Percentage of refugee girls and boys aged 3-24 years old who have achieved their grade level competencies |
| IN4: Number of crisis-affected host community girls and boys aged 3-24 years old receiving adequate education materials, supplies and equipment aligned with Education Sector standards |
| CO2: Support decision-making by collecting and sharing timely and accurate information, produce relevant business intelligence strategies and promote transparent sectoral activities. |
| IN1: Number of IM products produced and published |
| IN2: Proportion of Logistics Sector partners’ satisfaction feedback rated as “Satisfied” and “Very Satisfied” in regard to IM products |
| IN3: Number of Logistics and GIS assessment |
| IN4: Number of access updates in the PRAC |
| CO2: Diversification of Shelter/ NFI response: To improve site safety, shelter quality, and household living conditions for the refugees and the host community living adjacent to Rohingya camps, as well as to reduce environmental impact of the Shelter and Non-Food Items response. |
| IN1: Number of Rohingya households with shelters meeting all Minimum Performance standards |
| IN2: Number of Rohingya households with shelters meeting at least 50% of Minimum Performance standards |
| IN3: Number of Rohingya households with shelters meeting Desired Performance standards |
| IN4: Number of Rohingya households reached with NFI voucher system |
| IN5: Number of Rohingya households benefiting from treated bamboo |
| IN6: Number of Rohingya households receiving LPG refills |
| IN7: Number of Rohingya households with access to at least one functioning household-level solar light |
| IN8: Number of site improvement works at the Rohingya household-level carried out |
| CO2: Further improve access to information – with a focus on currently underserved areas and groups – through rationalised, community-centric and evidence-based communication and community engagement approaches. |
| IN1: Number of refugee and host community members reached through CwC services |
| IN2: Percentage of refugee and host community members who reported that CwC contents/messages are accessible and understandable |
| IN3: Percentage of refugee and host community members that feel informed about the kind of aid and services available to them. |
| CO2: Promote a community-based approach to the response, support community self-protection mechanisms and facilitate meaningful access to specialized services for persons at heightened protection risk, including girls, boys, women and men of all ages and with diverse needs and vulnerabilities, with the ultimate aim of mitigating exposure to protection risks, strengthen the resilience of affected communities, and place communities at the center of the response in line with AAP principles. |
| IN1: Number of people reached by community-led messaging on key protection risks and related mitigation measures |
| IN2: Number of community-led initiatives supported by humanitarian actors |
| IN3: Percentage of the CBCPMs that demonstrate ability to monitor, respond and mitigate child protection risks in their blocks in the camps and in the host communities |
| IN4: Percentage of camps with established Protection Emergency Response Units whose members are trained and ready to be deployed |
| CO2: Promote a common understanding of context, needs, priorities, response progress and gaps, and an integrated and multi-sector approach to gender mainstreaming |
| IN1: Number of sitreps produced and shared, which include detailed sex, age and diversity disaggregated data, situation and gender analysis from all sectors, and clearly identify gaps in refugee and host community response |
| IN2: Number of 4W and other IM products released that are comprehensive and are actively used for operational and strategic decision making |
| IN3: Number of updates produced on monsoon and cyclone (including monsoon reports, and reports on status of cyclone preparedness) |
| CO2: Holistically upgrade and improve the settlement areas and their immediate surroundings, ensuring the centrality of community-led decision making, linked to construction and maintenance works that enable safe, dignified and resilient living conditions ensuring access is for women, girls and children. Ensuring the centrality of community led decision making. |
| IN1: Number of Specific vulnerable groups (elderly, disabled, single-headed households, etc.) benefit from resilience-building and DRR support. |
| IN2: Number of individuals living in camps where natural hazards have been mapped and an operational plan tested |
| CO2: Promote portable skills development opportunities for Rohingya and enhance the livelihoods and resilience of host communities. |
| IN1: Number of people representing households receiving livelihoods support disaggregated by sex |
| IN2: Number of people (representing HHs) receiving portable skills support disaggregated by sex |
| IN3: Percentage of households not applying extreme coping strategy disaggregated by sex |
| CO2: Promote a community-based approach to the response, support community self-protection mechanisms and facilitate meaningful access to specialized services for persons at heightened protection risk, including girls, boys, women and men of all ages and with diverse needs and vulnerabilities, with the ultimate aim of mitigating exposure to protection risks, strengthen the resilience of affected communities, and place communities at the center of the response in line with AAP principles. |
| IN1: Number of people reached by community-led messaging on key protection risks and related mitigation measures |
| IN2: Number of community-led initiatives supported by humanitarian actors |
| IN3: Percentage of the CBCPMs that demonstrate ability to monitor, respond and mitigate child protection risks in their blocks in the camps and in the host communities |
| IN4: Percentage of camps with established Protection Emergency Response Units whose members are trained and ready to be deployed |
| CO2: Ensure the prevention and timely response to communicable disease risks including diseases with outbreak potential, and prepare for other health emergencies including monsoon and cyclone |
| IN1: Number of diarrhoea treatment beds available in case of an outbreak in host community and refugee camp setting |
| IN2: Proportion of EWARS alerts investigated within 48 hours |
| IN3: Coverage of DPT3 among <1 year old |
| CO3: Strengthen camp level coordination, by facilitating joint initiatives and establishing community consultation and dialogue mechanisms. |
| IN1: Number of community discussions on macro-settlement facilitated |
| IN2: Number of joint activities carried out with government representatives |
| CO3: To strengthen the collective nutrition sector response through timely collection and analysis of nutrition data, information management and effective coordination |
| IN1: Number of JRP agencies regularly participating in sector coordination meetings |
| IN2: Number of assessments/surveys conducted in 2020 |
| IN3: Proportion of camps having regular NS AAP meetings with communities |
| IN4: HC: Number of SMART, Coverage, NCA or other survey implemented. |
| IN5: GENDER: percentage of partner project proposals that score 4 based on the IASC Gender with Age Marker self- assessment throughout the stages of the program cycle from planning, to monitoring and evaluation. |
| CO3: To ensure the change of potentially dangerous behaviours through access and exposure to innovative hygiene promotion (including hygiene items) for all refugees living in camps and affected host communities. |
| IN1: Percentage of targeted people disaggregated by sex, age and disability able to demonstrate 3 critical hygiene practices |
| IN2: Proportion of targeted people disaggregated by sex, age and disability washing hands with water and soap after defecation. |
| IN3: Percentage of women and girls adopting safe and healthy menstrual hygiene management practices |
| IN4: Number of targeted households accessing hygiene supplies through a voucher system. |
| CO3: Lead advocacy and resource mobilization efforts for the response. |
| IN1: 1. Number of donor and high-level visits to Cox’s Bazar facilitated, and donor events supported |
| IN2: 2. Number of funding updates produced and shared |
| IN3: 3. Number JRP monitoring reports produced and shared that provide update on both refugee and host community response progress and funding |
| IN4: 4. Number issues-based advocacy papers produced and supporting common messaging (including humanitarian access tracking and analysis) |
| CO3: Encourage healthy living, improve health seeking behaviour and utilisation of essential service package among refugees and host populations through community engagement, with special attention to gender and age considerations and vulnerable groups |
| IN1: Proportion of Community Health Workers/volunteers trained on at least 4 core training packages |
| IN2: Percentage of women who had at least 4 ANC visits by the time of delivery |
| IN3: Percentage of households visited every two weeks by community health workers |
| IN4: Number of persons reached through community psychosocial group activities per year |
| CO3: Support system strengthening, by supporting Government and local partners, promoting peaceful coexistence within and between refugee and host communities |
| IN1: Number of joint initiatives that foster social cohesion between refugees and host community |
| IN2: Number of initiatives with government officials that develop capacity, to protect and deliver quality services |
| IN3: Proportion of trained local/national organizations staff who show an increase in knowledge on the training topics |
| IN4: Percentage of Inter-agency Child Protection SOPs developed endorsed and implemented by both agencies and the government |
| CO3: Improve participation of and accountability to affected people through adoption of minimum standards for the referral and resolution of community feedback; and through increased use collective data analysis. |
| IN1: Number of trainings/orientation sessions organized for agencies/sectors to mainstreaming common feedback standards |
| IN2: Number of agencies/sectors partners following the common feedback mechanism standards |
| IN3: Percentage of refugee and host community members who reported that they have no barriers to using complaint/ feedback mechanisms |
| CO3: Augment logistics capacity by the design of temporary common logistics services and enhance supply chain resilience to allow continuous and unimpeded flow of humanitarian supplies. |
| IN1: Percentage of Logistics Sector partners’ satisfaction feedback rated as “Satisfied” and “Very Satisfied” in regard to common logistics services |
| IN2: Proportion of storage service requests delivered in full (accepted, storage provided and released) |
| IN3: Number of organizations using common logistics services |
| IN4: Number of organisations accessing preparedness equipment/support |
| CO3: Support system strengthening, by supporting Government and local partners, promoting peaceful coexistence within and between refugee and host communities |
| IN1: Number of joint initiatives that foster social cohesion between refugees and host community |
| IN2: Number of initiatives with government officials that develop capacity, to protect and deliver quality services |
| IN3: Proportion of trained local/national organizations staff who show an increase in knowledge on the training topics |
| IN4: Percentage of Inter-agency Child Protection SOPs developed endorsed and implemented by both agencies and the government |
| CO3: Community Engagement - Ensure refugee and host community ownership, as well as active and meaningful participation and engagement in the education of crisis-affected girls and boys aged 3-24 years old |
| IN1: Number of Learning Facility Education Committees (in the refugee camps), including caregivers, trained on learning facility management, Disaster risk reduction, and Community participatory engagement |
| IN2: Number of refugee girls and boys aged 3-24 years old engaged in social cohesion initiatives |
| IN3: 3.4 Number of Disaster Risk Reduction awareness sessions conducted in the host community (non-formal / community-based schools) |
| IN4: Number of caregivers in the Rohingya community (disaggregated by sex) sensitized on child/youth rights, protection and parenting |
| CO3: Focused engagement: To encourage self-reliance, and peaceful coexistence by increasing the Rohingya refugee’s involvement in decisions concerning Shelter and Non-Food Items assistance and providing support to the host community living adjacent to Rohingya camps. |
| IN1: Number of blocks benefiting from community-led shelter programmes |
| IN2: Number of people trained |
| IN3: Number of host community households benefiting from shelter support |
| IN4: Number of host community households receiving solar lights or support for connection to the grid |
| IN5: Number of HLP cases addressed through alternative dispute resolution (Rohingya and host community) |
| CO3: Conduct capacity building exercises to strengthen emergency preparedness and response skills of inter-agency responders on the ground and to ensure the sustainability of services once the ETS has left. |
| IN1: Conduct capacity building for inter-agency staff |
| CO3: Support system strengthening, by supporting Government and local partners, promoting peaceful coexistence within and between refugee and host communities |
| IN1: Number of joint initiatives that foster social cohesion between refugees and host community |
| IN2: Number of initiatives with government officials that develop capacity, to protect and deliver quality services |
| IN3: Proportion of trained local/national organizations staff who show an increase in knowledge on the training topics |
| IN4: Percentage of Inter-agency Child Protection SOPs developed endorsed and implemented by both agencies and the government |
| CO3: Support social cohesion through enhancement and restoration of natural resources. |
| IN1: Number of hectares covered/rehabilitated through environmental restoration activities. |
| IN2: Percentage of targeted host community population participating in environmental activities |
| IN3: Number of sites with rehabilitation initiatives undertaken, including reforestation, land stabilization and watersheds rehabilitation |
| CO4: Boys and girls including adolescents facing life-threatening risks of abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, and severe distress have access to well-coordinated and gender-sensitive quality child protection services by 2022 |
| IN1: Number of targeted affected and at-risk girls and boys including adolescents with access to quality age, diversity and gender sensitive child protection services. |
| IN2: Number of girls and boys benefiting from age, diversity and gender sensitive structured and sustained, mental health and psychosocial support services |
| IN3: Number of identified girls and boys at risk who received specialized age and gender sensitive child protection service through individual case management to meet their unique needs |
| IN4: Number of caregivers who receive MHPSS, positive parenting and other kind support leading to improved relationships with the children under their care |
| IN5: Proportion of the total number of CP actors [social workers, community volunteers, government officials] and non-child protection actors who have received CP training who demonstrate increased knowledge and skills in providing age- and gender- sensitive child protection services |
| IN6: Number of adolescents receiving services including life skills, and pre-vocational skills, resilience activities and peacebuilding skills |
| CO4: Boys and girls including adolescents facing life-threatening risks of abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, and severe distress have access to well-coordinated and gender-sensitive quality child protection services by 2022 |
| IN1: Number of targeted affected and at-risk girls and boys including adolescents with access to quality age, diversity and gender sensitive child protection services. |
| IN2: Number of girls and boys benefiting from age, diversity and gender sensitive structured and sustained, mental health and psychosocial support services |
| IN3: Number of identified girls and boys at risk who received specialized age and gender sensitive child protection service through individual case management to meet their unique needs |
| IN4: Number of caregivers who receive MHPSS, positive parenting and other kind support leading to improved relationships with the children under their care |
| IN5: Proportion of the total number of CP actors [social workers, community volunteers, government officials] and non-child protection actors who have received CP training who demonstrate increased knowledge and skills in providing age- and gender- sensitive child protection services |
| IN6: Number of adolescents receiving services including life skills, and pre-vocational skills, resilience activities and peacebuilding skills |
| CO4: Boys and girls including adolescents facing life-threatening risks of abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, and severe distress have access to well-coordinated and gender-sensitive quality child protection services by 2022 |
| IN1: Number of targeted affected and at-risk girls and boys including adolescents with access to quality age, diversity and gender sensitive child protection services. |
| IN2: Number of girls and boys benefiting from age, diversity and gender sensitive structured and sustained, mental health and psychosocial support services |
| IN3: Number of identified girls and boys at risk who received specialized age and gender sensitive child protection service through individual case management to meet their unique needs |
| IN4: Number of caregivers who receive MHPSS, positive parenting and other kind support leading to improved relationships with the children under their care |
| IN5: Proportion of the total number of CP actors [social workers, community volunteers, government officials] and non-child protection actors who have received CP training who demonstrate increased knowledge and skills in providing age- and gender- sensitive child protection services |
| IN6: Number of adolescents receiving services including life skills, and pre-vocational skills, resilience activities and peacebuilding skills |
| CO4: Strengthen health sector coordination, information management and monitoring towards achieving rational, standardized and accountable health service delivery |
| IN1: Proportion of primary health centers, health posts, and field hospitals who received supportive supervision at least twice per year |
| IN2: Number of camp-level health coordination meetings held |
| IN3: Average reporting rate in DHIS2 for FDMN server |
| IN4: Proportion of PHCs and health posts where individual satisfaction is monitored through exit surveys or other community feedback mechanism |
| CO5: Improve access to quality survivor-centered services by responding to individual needs, preventing and mitigating of GBV risks, and empowering women, girls and survivors of GBV |
| IN1: Number of community activists (women, adolescent girls, adolescent boys and men) trained and engaged in GBV prevention strategies using tested social change approaches in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN2: Number of individuals benefiting from structured PSS services that meet minimum standards (by age, sex, diversity), in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN3: Number of women and girls benefiting from skills development and empowerment programming (by age, diversity) in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN4: Number of trained GBV service providers and other humanitarian staff who achieved at least 60% post-test score after attending trainings in case management, GBVIMS, CMR and GBV IASC Guidelines, in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN5: Number of sectors that have GBV risk mitigation actions included in their sector plans and activity implementation in line with the IASC GBV Guidelines |
| IN6: Percentage of reported sexual violence cases that were referred and received medical care within 72 hours |
| IN7: Percentage of camps/sites where there is functional GBV referral system with effective field level coordination mechanism of multi-sectoral GBV response services |
| CO5: Improve access to quality survivor-centered services by responding to individual needs, preventing and mitigating of GBV risks, and empowering women, girls and survivors of GBV |
| IN1: Number of community activists (women, adolescent girls, adolescent boys and men) trained and engaged in GBV prevention strategies using tested social change approaches in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN2: Number of individuals benefitting from structured PSS services that meet minimum standards (by age, sex, diversity), in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN3: Number of women and girls benefiting from skills development and empowerment programming (by age, diversity) in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN4: Number of trained GBV service providers and other humanitarian staff who achieved at least 60% post-test score after attending trainings in case management, GBVIMS, CMR and GBV IASC Guidelines, in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN5: Number of sectors that have GBV risk mitigation actions included in their sector plans and activity implementation in line with the IASC GBV Guidelines |
| IN6: Percentage of reported sexual violence cases that were referred and received medical care within 72 hours |
| IN7: Percentage of camps/sites where there is functional GBV referral system with effective field level coordination mechanism of multi-sectoral GBV response services |
| CO5: Improve access to quality survivor-centered services by responding to individual needs, preventing and mitigating of GBV risks, and empowering women, girls and survivors of GBV |
| IN1: Number of community activists (women, adolescent girls, adolescent boys and men) trained and engaged in GBV prevention strategies using tested social change approaches in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN2: Number of individuals benefiting from structured PSS services that meet minimum standards (by age, sex, diversity), in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN3: Number of women and girls benefiting from skills development and empowerment programming (by age, diversity) in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN4: Number of trained GBV service providers and other humanitarian staff who achieved at least 60% post-test score after attending trainings in case management, GBVIMS, CMR and GBV IASC Guidelines, in the camps and targeted host community |
| IN5: Number of sectors that have GBV risk mitigation actions included in their sector plans and activity implementation in line with the IASC GBV Guidelines |
| IN6: Percentage of reported sexual violence cases that were referred and received medical care within 72 hours |
| IN7: Percentage of camps/sites where there is functional GBV referral system with effective field level coordination mechanism of multi-sectoral GBV response services |
| CO6: Promote an integrated and multi-sectoral Protection, Age, Gender and Diversity approach |
| IN1: Proportion of other sectors with established and trained Protection Mainstreaming Focal Points |
| IN2: Number of Protection Mainstreaming trainings organized for other sectors’ staff |
| IN3: Percentage of other sectors with strategic and/or operational frameworks (sectors’ strategies, work plans, SOPs, assessments, etc.) which mainstream Protection |
| IN4: Percentage of sectors’ partners that have at least one trained PSEA and child safeguarding focal point |
| CO6: Promote an integrated and multi-sectoral Protection, Age, Gender and Diversity approach |
| IN1: Proportion of other sectors with established and trained Protection Mainstreaming Focal Points |
| IN2: Number of Protection Mainstreaming trainings organized for other sectors’ staff |
| IN3: Percentage of other sectors with strategic and/or operational frameworks (sectors’ strategies, work plans, SOPs, assessments, etc.) which mainstream Protection |
| IN4: Percentage of sectors’ partners that have at least one trained PSEA and child safeguarding focal point |
| CO6: Promote an integrated and multi-sectoral Protection, Age, Gender and Diversity approach |
| IN1: Proportion of other sectors with established and trained Protection Mainstreaming Focal Points |
| IN2: Number of Protection Mainstreaming trainings organized for other sectors’ staff |
| IN3: Percentage of other sectors with strategic and/or operational frameworks (sectors’ strategies, work plans, SOPs, assessments, etc.) which mainstream Protection |
| IN4: Percentage of sectors’ partners that have at least one trained PSEA and child safeguarding focal point |
| CO7: Monitor and advocate for access to territory, prevention of refoulement, respect for refugees’ rights, whilst enhancing continuous registration and documentation for all refugee women, men, girls and boys, in order to contribute to sustainable solutions. |
| IN1: Number of situational protection reports produced by the Protection Working Group (PWG), based on common Protection Monitoring Framework and/or ad hoc assessments (e.g. rapid protection Assessments, Border Monitoring, Settlement Protection Profiles, etc.), with recommendation on programming and advocacy priorities |
| IN2: Number of cases supported with legal aid and related services including victims of trafficking and exploitation disaggregated by age and sex |
| IN3: Percentage of camps and targeted host community locations in which trainings on mediation and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are organized for local authorities and community representatives |
| IN4: Percentage of camps with established Protection Emergency Response Units whose members are trained and ready to be deployed |
External documents
-
2020 Covid-19 Response Plan: Addendum to the…
-
2020 Covid-19 Response Plan: Addendum Annexes
-
2020 Joint Response Plan: Rohingya Humanitarian…