-
Requirements ($)$25.6 million
-
Current funding ($)$50.6 million
-
Coverage198%
Indicators overview
17-Sep-2024
Indicators overview
| Indicator | Unit | Baseline | Target | Reached | Reached % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO1: Coordination: The coordination structure is fit for purpose and facilitates a timely and effective response to people in need | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: # of HCT reviews and strategic reflections conducted
|
Numbers
|
1
|
2
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP1: Output 1: # of ICCT updates delivered to the HCT
|
Numbers
|
12
|
12
|
7
|
100%
|
|
INOP2: Output 2: # of joint ICCT/HCT meetings held
|
Meetings
|
2
|
4
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP3: Output 3: # of mandatory area of responsibility presentations to the HCT
|
Presentations
|
48
|
48
|
4
|
100%
|
|
INOP4: Output 4: # of ICCT field missions
|
Missions
|
0
|
2
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO2: Coordination: The annual HNO is evidence-based with data drawn from a range of coordinated, inter-sectoral needs assessments which accurately identify people in need | |||||
|
INOP1: Output 1: # of sector-specific and inter-sectoral needs assessments completed
|
Assessments
|
500
|
500
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO3: Coordination: Decision-makers have access to robust and rigorous data on internal and cross-border population movements, needs, response and gaps enabling them to make informed funding and programme decisions | |||||
|
INOP1: Output 1: # of households assessed as part of the annual WoA Assessment
|
Households
|
10,000
|
20,000
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO4: PSEA: Community mobilization, consultation, and awareness-raising on PSEA in each community receiving and affected by humanitarian assistance. | |||||
|
INOP1: Output 1: % of sites, health facilities and educational centers reached with communications materials on PSEA, report on SEA, and access survivor-cantered assistance.
|
Facilities
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO5: PSEA: PSEA task force adopt, implement and track progress against uniformed protocols/guidelines for prompt, safe, and survivor-cantered investigations at country-level in line with organizational investigation protocols. | |||||
|
INOP1: Output 1: % PSEA taskforce members, cluster members, and local partner personnel trained on SEA guidelines and protocols for investigations, including survivor-centered principles., including ToT.
|
Individuals
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO6: PSEA: Safe, accessible, child-sensitive mechanisms are in place for reporting SEA, particularly in high-risk areas | |||||
|
INOP1: Output 1: # of existing complaint and feedback mechanisms in the humanitarian response used for reporting SEA allegations.
|
Numbers
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP2: Output 2: # Of staff appointed and supported in operating complaint channels are also trained to recognize SEA and know where to report.
|
Staff
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO7: AAP: Clusters and implementing partners incorporate AAP activities into programming | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: % of clusters and partners that have incorporated AAP activities in all project phases in AHF proposals
|
Percentage
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO8: AAP: More people know how to give feedback on humanitarian assistance, organisations and staff | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: % of people asked in WoAA who say they are aware of how to give feedback and make complaints
|
Percentage
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO9: AAP: More affected people feel informed about available humanitarian assistance | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: % of people asked in WoAA who say they feel more informed about humanitarian assistance
|
Percentage
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO10: AAP: More national NGOs and their staff participate in and help lead collective AAP activities | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: % of local NGOs attending WG and SWG meetings, and who lead the Working Group, sub-WGs, and task teams
|
NNGOs
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO11: AAP: Feedback from organisations is collectively analysed and presented to decision makers | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: Number of analytical products created and disseminated to response and organisational decision makers
|
Products
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO12: RCCE: Clusters and implementing partners incorporate RCCE activities into programming | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: % of clusters and partners that have incorporated RCCE activities in their projects
|
Percentage
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO13: RCCE: Affected people have improved knowledge on protective health behaviors and practices | |||||
|
INOC1: Outcome 1: % of affected people who adopted new preventive health measures to protect themselves from emergent health risks
|
Percentage
|
No data
|
No data
|
No data
|
0%
|
| CO14: GiHA: Gender is mainstreamed into humanitarian action | |||||
|
INOP1: Output 1: Number of clusters with an active cluster gender focal point
|
Clusters
|
5
|
7
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP2: Output 2: % of inter-cluster and cluster-specific assessments that incorporate SADD and gender analysis
|
Percentage
|
No data
|
100
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP3: Output 3: Multi-sectoral gender analysis is conducted once a year
|
Joint Analyses
|
0
|
1
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP4: Output 4: Number of clusters that incorporate gender aspects into their plans, strategies and programming based on gender analysis
|
Clusters
|
No data
|
7
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP5: Output 5: Number of guidance notes, advocacy briefs and knowledge products developed by the GiHA WG to guide gender mainstreaming within the cluster response
|
Products
|
3
|
5
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP6: Output 6: Number of humanitarian stakeholders who participate in GiHA related trainings and demonstrate enhanced capacities from evaluation tests
|
Staff
|
0
|
200
|
No data
|
0%
|
|
INOP7: Output 7: Number of clusters that have regular engagement and consultation with women’s CSOs and use their inputs to inform planning and programming
|
Clusters
|
1
|
7
|
No data
|
0%
|