Rohingya (JRP)

Protection

Financials
Presence
  • Requirements ($)
    $92 million
  • Funding ($)
    $63.6 million
  • % Funded
    69.2%

Sector Objectives

1

Monitor and advocate for access to territory, prevention of refoulement, respect for Rohingya refugee rights, while enhancing continuous registration and documentation for all Rohingya refugee women, men, girls and boys, in order to ensure effective, targeted protection and assistance and work toward sustainable solutions.

menu
Indicator Unit Target Result Progress
Number of situational protection reports produced by the Protection Working Group (PWG), based on common Protection Monitoring Framework and/or ad hoc assessments (e.g. rapid protection Assessments, Border Monitoring, Settlement Protection Profiles, etc.), with recommendation on programming and advocacy priorities.
Reports
18
No data
Number of individuals supported with legal aid and related services, including victims of trafficking and exploitation, disaggregated by age and sex.
Individuals
21,500
No data
Number of individuals among service providers, local authorities and community representatives trained on mediation and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
Individuals
250
No data
Percentage of refugees for whom data disaggregated by sex, age, location and specific needs is available and updated. (%)
Percentage
100%
No data

2

Promote a community-based approach to the response, support community self-protection mechanisms and facilitate meaningful access to specialized services for persons at heightened protection risk, including girls, boys, women and men of all ages, who have diverse needs and vulnerabilities, with the aim of mitigating exposure to protection risks, strengthening the resilience of affected communities in order to build skills for return and reintegration, and placing communities at the centre of the response, as well as by ensuring active and meaningful two-way communication between humanitarian actors and communities of concern, in line with Accountability to Affected Populations (AAP) principles.

menu
Indicator Unit Target Result Progress
Number of people reached by community-led messaging on key protection risks and related mitigation measures.
Individuals
1,085,036
No data
Percentage of community-based child protection network members who report increased confidence in their ability to prevent and respond to child protection risks. (Target: 80% of 1060 CBCPM)
Percentage
80%
No data
Percentage of camps with established Protection Emergency Response Units whose members are trained and activated.
Percentage
100%
No data
Number of community-led initiatives supported by humanitarian actors.
Initiatives
35,000
No data

3

Support system strengthening together with Government and local partners, including local women-led rights organizations and disabled persons organizations promoting peaceful coexistence within and between the Rohingya refugee and host communities.

menu
Indicator Unit Target Result Progress
Percentage of community groups led by women and girls.(%)
Percentage
50%
No data
Percentage of Interagency Child Protection SOPs developed endorsed and implemented by both agencies and the government. (%)
Percentage
100%
No data
Number of individuals from service providers and authorities trained on protection including gender.
Individuals
10,100
No data
Number of initiatives that foster social cohesion between refugees and host community.
Initiatives
16
No data
Number of initiatives supporting child protection systems strengthening together with authorities.
Initiatives
25
No data

4

Ensure that boys and girls, including adolescents, facing life-threatening risks of abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, and severe distress have access to well-coordinated and gender-responsive quality child/youth protection services.

menu
Indicator Unit Target Result Progress
Number of adolescents (disaggregated by sex and disability) receiving services including life skills, and pre-vocational skills, resilience activities and peacebuilding skills.
Individuals
67,861
No data
Percentage of the total number of CP actors [social workers, community volunteers, government officials] and non-child protection actors who have received CP training who demonstrate increased knowledge and skills in providing age- and gender- sensitive child protection services. (Target: 80% of 8500 (3500 CP and staffs + 5000 Volunteers)
Percentage
80%
No data
Number of targeted affected and at-risk girls and boys including adolescents with access to quality age, diversity and gender sensitive child protection services.
Individuals
408,860
No data
Number of girls and boys benefiting from age, diversity and gender sensitive structured and sustained, mental health and psychosocial support services.
Individuals
279,435
No data
Number of caregivers (male and female) who receive MHPSS, positive parenting and other in-kind support leading to improved relationships with the children under their care.
Individuals
81,918
No data
Number of identified girls and boys at risk who received specialized age and gender sensitive child protection service through individual case management to meet their unique needs.
Individuals
54,460
No data
Percentage of targeted caregivers who report enhanced skills to fulfil their responsibilities towards their children following their participation in child protection programme. (Target: 70% of 82000)
Percentage
70%
No data

5

Improve access to quality survivor-centered services by responding to individual needs, preventing and mitigating GBV risks, and supporting women, girls, boys and men survivors of GBV in Rohingya refugee camps and targeted areas in host communities.

menu
Indicator Unit Target Result Progress
Percentage of trained GBV service providers and other humanitarian staff who achieved at least 60% post-test score after attending trainings in case management, GBVIMS, CMR and GBV IASC Guidelines, in the camps and targeted host community. (%)
Percentage
85%
No data
Percentage of reported sexual violence cases that were referred and received medical care within 72 hours. (%)
Percentage
100%
No data
Percentage of camps/sites (34 camps /11 unions) where there is functional GBV referral system with effective field level coordination mechanism of multi-sectoral GBV response services. (%)
Percentage
80%
No data
Number of community activists (women, adolescent girls, adolescent boys and men) trained and engaged in GBV prevention strategies using tested social change approaches in the camps and targeted host community.
Individuals
22,500
No data
Number of individuals benefitting from structured PSS services that meet minimum standards (by age, sex, diversity), in the camps and targeted host community.
Individuals
140,000
No data
Number of sectors that have GBV risk mitigation actions included in their sector plans and activity implementation in line with the IASC GBV Guidelines.
Sectors
7
No data
Number of women and girls benefiting from skills development and empowerment programming (by age, diversity) in the camps and targeted host community.
Individuals
125,000
No data

6

Promote an integrated and multi-sectoral Protection, Age, Gender and Diversity approach.

menu
Indicator Unit Target Result Progress
Percentage of sector partners that have at least one trained PSEA and child safeguarding focal point. (%)
Percentage
100%
No data
Number of sectors and working groups with active Protection Mainstreaming Focal Points.
Sectors
9
No data
Percentage of other sectors with strategic and/or operational frameworks (sectors’ strategies, work plans, SOPs, assessments, etc.) which mainstream Protection. (%)
Percentage
100%
No data
Number of individuals of different Sectors trained on Protection Mainstreaming, disaggregated by gender.
Individuals
1,130
No data

Sector member organizations

08-Dec-2024


Sector member organizations

Organization Projects Sectors Requirements ($)
ACT Alliance / Christian Aid
$191 thousand
ACT Alliance / DanChurchAid
$250 thousand
Action Contre la Faim - Action Against Hunger International
$295 thousand
BRAC
$2.9 million
CARE Bangladesh
$1.5 million
Caritas Bangladesh
$0.8 million
Danish Refugee Council
$2.9 million
Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e.V. (German Agro Action)
$265 thousand
Educo - Fundación Educación y Cooperación, ChildFund Alliance member
$397 thousand
Handicap International - Humanity & Inclusion
$2 million
Helvetas Swiss Intercooperation
$191 thousand
International Organization for Migration
$8.8 million
International Rescue Committee
$2.3 million
Light House Organization
$496 thousand
NGO Forum for Public Health
$478 thousand
Norwegian Refugee Council
$1.1 million
Oxfam GB
$1 million
Plan International Bangladesh
$1.7 million
Relief International
$1.4 million
Samaj Kalyan O Unnayan Shangstha
$142 thousand
Save the Children
$3.1 million
Terre des Hommes - Lausanne
$458 thousand
UN Women
$1.5 million
United Nations Children's Fund
$11.4 million
United Nations Development Programme
$2.2 million
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
$39.4 million
United Nations Population Fund
$8 million
World Vision Bangladesh
$1.3 million